For your amusement and edification, County has produced stats for those keeping score at home.
Here's what K posted on Jan 3rd, 2017:
|
PLAYER
|
GAMES PLAYED
|
POSSIBLE PTS
|
PTS EARNED
|
GAMER RATE (GR)
|
VS. AVG GR
|
% 1st
|
% 2nd
|
G
|
113
|
176.000
|
89.115
|
50.6%
|
131.2%
|
37.2%
|
22.1%
|
Si
|
76
|
128.667
|
55.417
|
43.1%
|
111.6%
|
22.4%
|
27.6%
|
K
|
93
|
147.333
|
62.167
|
42.2%
|
109.4%
|
30.1%
|
17.2%
|
Z
|
34
|
59.000
|
23.375
|
39.6%
|
102.7%
|
26.5%
|
23.5%
|
Sc
|
12
|
22.333
|
7.250
|
32.5%
|
84.1%
|
16.7%
|
8.3%
|
J
|
70
|
117.000
|
35.417
|
30.3%
|
78.4%
|
10.0%
|
22.9%
|
M
|
41
|
68.333
|
19.875
|
29.1%
|
75.4%
|
12.2%
|
19.5%
|
W
|
115
|
180.667
|
46.813
|
25.9%
|
67.2%
|
12.2%
|
25.2%
|
Others
|
17
|
34.000
|
4.667
|
13.7%
|
35.6%
|
11.8%
|
0.0%
|
And here are the GAMER RATES for just 2016 (I’ve lumped Sc and “Others” together given how few games were played for each). Looks like 2016 was a banner year for K J:
|
Possible Points
|
Points Earned
|
GAMER RATE
|
K
|
61.333
|
28.292
|
46%
|
Si
|
51.667
|
22.583
|
44%
|
Sc + Others
|
10.000
|
4.125
|
41%
|
G
|
73.333
|
29.323
|
40%
|
Z
|
57.667
|
22.708
|
39%
|
M
|
20.667
|
7.042
|
34%
|
J
|
40.333
|
10.833
|
27%
|
W
|
77.333
|
19.313
|
25%
|
... the Cumulative Monthly chart showing the gradual decline of G…he’s starting to lose it in his old age:
Best of luck to all in 2017!!!
Updated
Follow-up message from K received Jan 15th, 2017
Gents,
Z made a suggestion that I should update my stats so that games with more players were worth more than games with less players. I agreed, so I’ve tweaked the stats to give better percentages (for the same place finish) for games with more players as compared to games with less players. I also changed the system in line with another suggestion from Z, wherein now the total points awarded for each game is equal to the number of players squared.
Long story short, although the total points now look quite different from my previous spreadsheet, really it’s the GAMER RATE percentage that is the only thing that matters, and these changes to the stats system didn’t really have too much of an impact on the GAMER RATE percentages. Didn’t change anybody’s overall placement, but did tighten up the gaps between places a little bit.
Revised summary stats under this new approach:
|
PLAYER
|
GAMES PLAYED
|
PTS EARNED
|
PTS POSSIBLE
|
GAMER RATE (GR)
|
VS. AVG GR
|
% 1st
|
% 2nd
|
G
|
113
|
680
|
1,213
|
56.0%
|
128.4%
|
37.2%
|
22.1%
|
Si
|
76
|
457
|
901
|
50.8%
|
116.4%
|
22.4%
|
27.6%
|
K
|
95
|
496
|
1,032
|
48.1%
|
110.2%
|
30.5%
|
17.9%
|
Z
|
36
|
201
|
423
|
47.6%
|
109.2%
|
27.8%
|
25.0%
|
Sc
|
12
|
69
|
160
|
43.1%
|
98.9%
|
16.7%
|
8.3%
|
J
|
70
|
321
|
831
|
38.6%
|
88.5%
|
10.0%
|
22.9%
|
M
|
41
|
176
|
491
|
35.8%
|
82.0%
|
12.2%
|
19.5%
|
W
|
117
|
372
|
1,258
|
29.6%
|
67.8%
|
12.0%
|
24.8%
|
Others
|
17
|
51
|
246
|
20.6%
|
47.2%
|
11.8%
|
0.0%
|
Thanks for the suggestions, Z, I prefer this new approach.
-K