2016 Year-End Gamer Stats and 2016 Year-End Gamer Stats Redux

For your amusement and edification, County has produced stats for those keeping score at home.

Here's what K posted on Jan 3rd, 2017:
 

CUMULATIVE STATS - 5 FEBRUARY 2015 THROUGH 29 DECEMBER 2016
PLAYER	GAMES PLAYED	POSSIBLE PTS	PTS EARNED	GAMER RATE (GR)	VS. AVG GR	% 1st	% 2nd
G	113	176.000	89.115	50.6%	131.2%	37.2%	22.1%
Si	76	128.667	55.417	43.1%	111.6%	22.4%	27.6%
K	93	147.333	62.167	42.2%	109.4%	30.1%	17.2%
Z	34	59.000	23.375	39.6%	102.7%	26.5%	23.5%
Sc	12	22.333	7.250	32.5%	84.1%	16.7%	8.3%
J	70	117.000	35.417	30.3%	78.4%	10.0%	22.9%
M	41	68.333	19.875	29.1%	75.4%	12.2%	19.5%
W	115	180.667	46.813	25.9%	67.2%	12.2%	25.2%
Others	17	34.000	4.667	13.7%	35.6%	11.8%	0.0%

And here are the GAMER RATES for just 2016 (I’ve lumped Sc and “Others” together given how few games were played for each).  Looks like 2016 was a banner year for K J:

 

	Possible Points	Points Earned	GAMER RATE
K	61.333	28.292	46%
Si	51.667	22.583	44%
Sc + Others	10.000	4.125	41%
G	73.333	29.323	40%
Z	57.667	22.708	39%
M	20.667	7.042	34%
J	40.333	10.833	27%
W	77.333	19.313	25%

 

... the Cumulative Monthly chart showing the gradual decline of G…he’s starting to lose it in his old age:

 

Best of luck to all in 2017!!!

 

 

Updated

Follow-up message from K received Jan 15th, 2017

Gents,

 

Z made a suggestion that I should update my stats so that games with more players were worth more than games with less players.  I agreed, so I’ve tweaked the stats to give better percentages (for the same place finish) for games with more players as compared to games with less players.  I also changed the system in line with another suggestion from Z, wherein now the total points awarded for each game is equal to the number of players squared. 

Long story short, although the total points now look quite different from my previous spreadsheet, really it’s the GAMER RATE percentage that is the only thing that matters, and these changes to the stats system didn’t really have too much of an impact on the GAMER RATE percentages.  Didn’t change anybody’s overall placement, but did tighten up the gaps between places a little bit.

 

Revised summary stats under this new approach:

 

CUMULATIVE STATS - 5 FEBRUARY 2015 THROUGH 2 JANUARY 2017
PLAYER	GAMES PLAYED	PTS EARNED	PTS POSSIBLE	GAMER RATE (GR)	VS. AVG GR	% 1st	% 2nd
G	113	680	1,213	56.0%	128.4%	37.2%	22.1%
Si	76	457	901	50.8%	116.4%	22.4%	27.6%
K	95	496	1,032	48.1%	110.2%	30.5%	17.9%
Z	36	201	423	47.6%	109.2%	27.8%	25.0%
Sc	12	69	160	43.1%	98.9%	16.7%	8.3%
J	70	321	831	38.6%	88.5%	10.0%	22.9%
M	41	176	491	35.8%	82.0%	12.2%	19.5%
W	117	372	1,258	29.6%	67.8%	12.0%	24.8%
Others	17	51	246	20.6%	47.2%	11.8%	0.0%

 

Thanks for the suggestions, Z, I prefer this new approach.

-K